Listening to Reason: Iran Speaks

by Clay Farrell

You know, in a White World, that is to say in a healthy White society in which all entities and individuals, all governmental agencies and structures, all socio-economic policies are geared primarily around the long-term interests and survival of the White race, things would and should be different.  But we are a long way from that. And we all know it. But we should understand when the current world in which we live skews our perceptions and attitudes about things and people that would not factor into a White World.

A case in point for me is a notion of respect I sometimes get when I see some political leaders standing up against the very forces that do indeed challenge our people’s long term interests and survival. When I view the current world and really pay attention to the voices that can be heard through the stranglehold of the Jewish-controlled mass media, I can grow to appreciate those voices. I can respect the fact that they can be heard and that they can clearly say the things that any White political leader should be saying.

Unfortunately, there are no White leaders standing up against the forces that are compromising the long-term interests and survival of our people. There are no White political leaders that, even if they do have a voice that can be heard through the Jewish-controlled mass media, are speaking up against these forces. All we have are these spineless, flaccid quasi-White political leaders that get voted into office and then use their potentially powerful voice only to actually work against the long-term interests of our people. They use their voice through the Jewish-controlled mass media doing and saying the things and promoting the policies that actually hurt our survivability. That is how they get elected to political office in the first place and why I really despise politicians and the entire democratic policy.

So where does that leave me? This leaves me paying a lot of attention to the things that some non-White political leaders are doing and saying that does work contrary to these threatening forces. For example, I like to hear what Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has to say. I have never been disappointed. I am only disappointed in the fact that it is this non-White, Red Sea pedestrian saying these things; not a White man.

I have had an opportunity to hear President Ahmadinejad on CNN’s Larry King Live show a couple of times now. Despite being interviewed by super-Jew, Larry King, Ahmadinejad’s voice can be loudly and clearly heard through. Now don’t misunderstand what I am saying but as far as leaders in the Middle East are concerned, Ahmadinejad has some endearing qualities. He seems to be very well educated, having a PhD in Engineering, well spoken, a fierce critic of US foreign-relations, and truly hated by the Jews. With that combination, he is bound to have some interesting things to say, right?

Well I do not plan on giving you a history or biography of President Ahmadinejad, but you might want to so some research on your own. And of course, as with anyone anywhere having anything less than a completely flattering thing to say about Israel, you really have to be objective about your research. He is very calculated with his words and handles news interviews, even with Jewish reporters, in a very competent and strategic manner.

And if you do decide to do some research, there is one thing to keep in mind. I remember Dr. Pierce told us many years ago about how difficult it can be trying to remain objective about thinking though events and individuals when the Middle East is concerned. I think it will help you remain more objective in your research and is a good thing to keep in mind.

In the summer of 2002, Dr. Pierce told us:

"Nearly everything that the average American thinks he knows about the Middle East -- everything told to him by the government or the media about current events or history in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Israel, or about American involvement in that part of the world -- is part of a tissue of lies spun by the Jews to serve their interests at the expense of ours."

Case in point, last month, in late September, President Ahmadinejad was interviewed by CNN’s Larry King. This is the second time I had an opportunity to watch an interview with Ahmadinejad on the Larry King Live show. And as we all know, Larry King, who was born Lawrence Zeiger is CNN’s super-Jew and he always gets the big interviews. While at nearly 80 years old, he is more fossilized than anything else, he is still a highly respected and well known as the top news interviewers in the country. He seems to get all of the big interviews and the latest interview I watched with President Ahmadinejad was another example.

The timing of this interview came as Ahmadinejad was visiting the United States for the annual U.N. General Assembly which is held in New York. But beyond this official visit to the US, the Larry King interview came just hours after President Obama made his shocking allegations. At the so called Group of 20 conference in Pittsburgh, which coincided with the U.N. General Assembly, Obama, the magical and mystical mulatto, flanked on both sides by his slightly Whiter peers from Britain and France spouted, "Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow,"  He went on to condemn what he called a "covert uranium enrichment facility" and I should add too that it was so covert that it was actually discovered many years and our government has been covertly monitoring this covert facility for a long time. Now that is what I call covert.

Kind of reminds me about the covert weapons stored in a neighboring country that we treat as our Gallant Little Ally in the Middle East and our unwavering alliance with that country puts us at odds with EVERY other country in that region. And a place where the Brooklyn Jew Larry King has his family roots. I am talking about Israel of course. That secret has been more of a public secret and by that I mean the Jewish controlled mass media will not talk about it. But this is truly no secret and declassified US Intelligence documents indicate knowledge of these weapons as far back as the mid 1970s. Hell, I read about them myself in the Wall Street Journal of all places at least ten years ago. But the fact that I am referencing an article from ten years ago at the same time I talk about Iran’s covert nuclear programs is precisely my point.

Remember, Larry King and the rest of his brethren in the media won’t talk about what they do not want Joe and Jill to think about. So when the President of the United States and his fellow-puppet World leaders make international news by wagging their fingers and condemning one of Israel’s neighbors and enemies for possibly developing the same weapons that they all know Israel already has, Jews like Larry King have something to talk about.

We should also remind ourselves that Iran had a very controversial election this year which also made international news for weeks. This was an election in which Ahmadinejad was democratically reelected as Iran’s President. This also comes up in the interview.

So we have super-Jew reporter Larry King set to interview this Axis of Evil Iranian President accused of hiding a nuclear weapons, violating human rights after the undesired DEMOCRATICALLY elected President handily won his reelection. And I should also point out he is almost always referred to by the controlled media as a Holocaust Denier. And believe me, it does not get more despicable than that from the Jewish media’s perspective. Yet another topic that comes up in the interview.

So let’s talk about the latest Larry King interview with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It started out with Larry’s opening comments of “Tonight, President Obama slams Iran for building a second and secret nuclear facility.” Bear in mind, when he says secret here, what he really should say is that Iran did something and did not ask permission of the International community, kind of like Israel did over thirty years ago. Shame on Iran for thinking it was a sovereign country and able to make its own decisions regarding any attempt to equal the playing field in the Middle East with our Gallant little ally looming close by. Anyway, Lawrence Zeiger, I mean Larry King continued saying, “Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad answers back in a prime time exclusive -- why does his country need two uranium enrichment sites?” Now that is what I call must-see TV and I was ready to see this arrogant Jew interview a man who knows exactly how to deal with arrogant Jews.

We should also note that President Ahmadinejad was talking through a translator and if you have followed the translation of anything he has ever said and in the US mass media, you might be suspicious. After all, I have heard him completely misquoted in the media for saying things that if you did just a little research would find were not accurate quotes. He is attributed with saying a lot of things he never said and those erroneous quotes have earned him the labels he now has. But rest assured, I have heard this exact same translator before and President Ahmadinejad is far too bright to trust just any interpreter. So I think what I heard was indeed what was said, or at least as close as it could be translated.

So the first line of questioning came as a direct response to what Obama had said earlier that day. The gist of it was that Iran was trying to build a nuclear facility, without notifying the IAEA, or the International Atomic Agency. So Ahmadinejad responded by saying that Iran did notify the IAEA and he was not sure what the issue was. He clearly explained what any country’s expected obligations are to the IAEA and clearly explained when Iran not only met those obligations but in fact exceeded those obligations. Well that is good enough for me. He has much more credibility with me than any US politician or Brooklyn Jew. Next question.

Lawrence, I mean Larry continued quoting three leaders of the free world, you remember, the three stooges I mentioned earlier, Obama his slightly Whiter peers from Britain and France, you know Kosher approved representatives from the he Great Democracies of the world. And King blasted “that's France, Britain and the United States. How do you react? All three are attacking you” with that famous Brooklyn scowl on his face.

And with a calm tone, smile and confidence, Ahmadinejad responded that these “statements really lack any legal credibility. And from our [Iran’s] standpoint, what they say is not of much value.” He went on asking the same question any sovereign state on this planet might ask if it were being accused or chastised by these stooges.  He said “Who exactly are they to decide about others around the world?” King grumbled back, “Doesn't it bother you that they say these things?” and Ahmadinejad retort was short and simple. He said “No…..Not at all. It doesn't matter to us.” Well played again. Next question.

Another point which was of particular interest to me focused on the Iranian Presidential elections that I mentioned earlier that created such a controversy and triggered international news coverage. News coverage I might add that was largely based on speculation, allegations, and most surprising to me, supposedly authenticated through social media websites. For the first time in my life I was seeing the mass-media quoting from places like FaceBook and MySpace to cover the news in Iran. Now that is very interesting indeed but another story altogether. I will get back to that in another broadcast.

Point now is that Larry King was questioning Ahmadinejad about these elections. Again, democracy oriented elections which ended with Ahmadinejad’s victory and a great upset for those that wanted to see him run out of office. Larry King’s entire tribe I suspect were upset the most; and certainly Israel was not happy about it.

King says, or more accurately implies that the election results had to be fraudulent because the results were announced just too quickly. King reminded Ahmadinejad that apparently roughly 40 million Iranians participated in the elections.  He pointed out that Iran still uses paper ballots all of which must be hand-counted. So how could it be possible to announce the official results less than 24 hours after the polls closed. King says, “How could you count votes so quickly?”

In the confident and intelligent way I am now accustom to hearing from Ahmadinejad, he said “It's quite simple. If you're familiar with Iran's electoral process, you'll have the answer quite clearly.” And that was a polite way of saying Ok you idiot, I am going to explain this one more time so please pay attention. Just so we all get this response clearly enough I will quote him directly.

Ahmadinejad said:

Forty million votes in 46,000 polling stations -- so, on average, there are less than a thousand votes cast in every polling box and there were only four candidates. So you can count all of that within half an hour. It's a very simple task. And there were 500,000 people involved in the counting. So it's -- the counting is done very easily. It's not a difficult task.

Next I guess King decided he could not challenge that kind of logic so with the Iranian democratic process off the agenda he turned to the fall out from the election. Or at least he was referring to the fall out from the election that was, as I mentioned earlier, extensively covered by the Jewish controlled media and to a very large extent reported and authenticated by social networking sites like FaceBook and MySpace. And I don’t know about you but I do not put a lot of faith in those websites for accurately reporting the news but I guess they get as much credibility as Larry King, CNN, FOX and all the other so-called “trusted” sources for news.

Anyway, now King wanted to know about this and asks “thousands and thousands of your own countrymen take to the streets to protest the election, denounce it as a fraud? How did you feel about that? I mean, here all these people, thousands of people, complaining about their vote. As a president of an Islamic Republic, did you not feel some pain over that?”

Once again, the Iranian President answered this as clearly and logically as anyone could hope for. Ahmadinejad said:

In any election, there's always a winner and someone loses. And that's precisely why you hold elections. Elections are meant for -- to, basically, people to see who wins and vote for the people they like. Now, say their party loses. What are they supposed to do, go on the streets all the time? That doesn't seem like the right thing to do either. There is a legal structure that defines how things are run, including the election process. Now, anyone who has a complaint can basically refer to the law and the law will take care of it.

Clearly Lawrence, I mean Larry, did not like that much logic to come out from his Iranian guest. He was looking for a little more of an emotional response I think. I really think he was trying to rattle Ahmadinejad’s cage a bit. So he tried again. King asks’ “Why did you crack -- why violence against women and children and the elderly? You unleashed against the protesters. Protesters can protest. They protest all the time. Why treat them violently? Why take action?”

And this was really one of my favorite parts of the interview. With a serious but calm look on his face and perhaps a slight sparkle in his eye, probably from the smile that was trying to break onto his face, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says:

Do you have the news from Pittsburgh today?

There were thousands and thousands of people there.

What were they protesting?

Why did the police use tear gas?

Why did they beat people up?

Why did they arrest people?

Could you tell me that?

I intentionally did not point this out earlier, and of course neither did Larry King when he was quoting the leaders of the free world. These three stooges, like I said just hours earlier had condemned Iran for its not so covert, but for the sake of presidential sound-bytes, covert nuclear programs.  On that very same day, police in Pittsburg were busy running around in fatigues, firing pepper spray, smoke grenades, and rubber bullets at protesters who were attempting to protest the Group of 20 summit where the three stooges had gathered with other diplomats.

So for me, it was almost poetic to hear this response come from Ahmadinejad after Larry asked him “Protesters can protest. They protest all the time. Why treat them violently? Why take action?” I am telling you it still brings a smile to my face and reemphasizes again to why I enjoyed this interview with Ahmadinejad.

But seriously, you really should listen to the entire interview and observe everything that was said. From that point in the interview forward, it continued to get better and better. Ahmadinejad once again was prepared intellectually and factually to handle our famous Jew from Brooklyn. He cited fact after fact, statistic after statistic of social issues that we have in the United States. Things Larry King did not have a clue about but desperately tried to tap dance around. Things the Jewish controlled media does not like to talk about much because it really does not serve their purposes.

At one point in the interview King thought he would drop the bomb on Ahmadinejad by asking about the shooting death of one young woman protester in Iran during these election riots. Her name was Neda and it made a lot of news in the US. He fired back with his own explanation for what might have happened and I think he made a pretty convincing argument for one possible explanation for that shooting.

Ahmadinejad followed that by referencing a failed coup attempt that was that was staged in Venezuela against Hugo Chavez in which an almost identical incident occurred. No I am not trying to imply that the CIA or some other Federal alphabet agency was trying to stage a coup in Iran or in Venezuela. Oh, heavens no, they would never do something like that. But you can research and decide that for yourself.

All I am saying here is that there is no doubt a lot of desire and motivation to get people like Ahmadinejad and Chavez out of power in their countries. These are people that have been democratically elected as the leaders of their respective countries and don’t have anything nice to say about Israel.

Right now I really just want to just focus on one more part of this Larry King Live interview with Ahmadinejad. And this was definitely my favorite part of the interview and it was not just because of the way Iranian President Ahmadinejad handled the questions. It was also the questions themselves and they way they were presented that really got my attention. It highlights what I really think is becoming a glaring chink in the Jewish armor. Allow me to explain.

When you have a single group of people, a single tribe of people, that put so much time and effort and have so much at stake when it comes to certain historical events, it is really important to maintain credibility when you talk about these events. I am talking about the Holocaust of course. And for many years now the Holocaust mythology has really started to unravel. Now I am not saying it was ever that tight or well documented to begin with. I am not saying that at all. I am just saying that more and more people, especially people outside of the United States but an increasing number within the United States as well, are really starting to seriously doubt the historic record. They are not buying what Stephen Spielberg, the noted historian that he is, right, is telling them. And even if they have bought it in the past, it is really losing its luster I think. As Dr. Pierce once said, the entirety of the Holocaust claims are getting a little shop-warn. I really don’t think the Holocaust bears the fruit that it once did.

However, despite that and perhaps because of it, at the same time, the Holocaust industry is still running strong. There have been several block buster movies come out of Hollywood in just the past year or two that keep this cash cow milking. But it is more than just that extortion racket. There is a clearly a vested interest for the Jews to keep this part of Jewish identity alive and well.

This single event, the Holocaust, at least from a contemporary standpoint, defines them as a people. It defines them as the premier victims on the planet. That racial victim identity coupled with Christian gospel that indentifies the Jews as Gods Chosen People, has allowed them to reach a position of global influence and power. And I think that on both fronts the Jews are really loosing their position in the minds of rational, independent thinkers.

This card is not playing as well as it once did but it is still being played. And when it is played I really do not think it has the game stopping power that it once did. It relies on the utter gullibility of anyone and everyone it is played on. And I think it really requires a leap of faith for anyone to use it these days without adding anything new or credible to the understanding people currently have of the Holocaust. Again, to continue promoting this as an irrefutable fact given everything I have just said, you either have to assume you have something irrefutable or that your audience is completely gullible. And while I do not question the gullibility of much of the US public, especially Joe and Jill Six Pack, I do question the gullibility of the entire international community that has also endured this game for decades now.

So now for my case in point; my favorite part of this interview. Towards the very end of the Larry King Live interview with President Ahmadinejad, Larry is ready to land his knock-out punch. Setting the stage for this knock-out punch was easy because another great leader at the U.N. Assembly that week was Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. And I do not need to give a biography of Netanyahu except just to remind you that he is an Israeli hard-liner. A true Zionist hawk that does not see much future for any Palestinians standing in his Zionist path.

So a quick video clip shows Netanyahu, standing behind the U.N. podium at the same assembly that the other clowns stood behind and confidently holds up what Reuters called “Nazi-era documents on the extermination of Jews” and what Larry King would assert to his guest Ahmadinejad were the “blueprints of Auschwitz”. Something that most all credible historians, that is historians that have credibility in my eyes, maintain does not exist.  And as Larry King really positions the Iranian President for the knock out punch, and puts on his best Jewish pout face and strongly asserts “Blueprints as evidence of the Nazi effort to exterminate the -- I may get personal for a moment. Don't mind me. I'm Jewish. I have had relatives, cousins, that were killed. How can you deny what is an obvious fact?”

So let me play that moment back for you so that you will understand my point here. This really illustrates what I mean when I say the Holocaust story, the entire package of events and historical reference, really requires some compelling new evidence or the complete gullibility of anyone hearing it. So if you are going to bring up the Holocaust at the U.N. General Assembly, I really think you should offer something compelling, something credible. Seriously! We are not talking about an entire assembly of men with the intelligence of a George W. Bush. Some of these people actually posses some intelligence, I am sure. I know that President Ahmadinejad does.

So the hardliner, Israeli hawk of a Zionist holds up documents that are supposedly at least 70 years old, copies no doubt from Kinko’s. Documents that are supposedly copies of the minutes of a conference in National Socialist Germany at which Nazi officials actually planned the so called Final Solution, a solution which led to the killing of six million Jews, and the supposed “original blueprints” of the Auschwitz death camps. This is the new, credible evidence he produces to chastise everyone at the assembly who sat quietly while Ahmadinejad spoke at that same assembly. A lot of them just walked out in a show of Kosher-solidarity and did not even hear the man speak. So Netanyahu holds up his documents and says "to those who gave this Holocaust denier a hearing, I say on behalf of my people, the Jewish people, and decent people everywhere: Have you no shame? Have you no decency?". Perhaps that scene will play out a little better when Stephen Spielberg writes his screen play for it and some famous Hollywood actor dramatically reads those lines. I think it would have more of an impact on the gullible boobus americanous that will sit through another Spielberg movie.

He was referring to the speech where Ahmadinejad highlighted what anyone would agree were "inhuman policies" which Israel has against Palestinian territories. You really do not have to wait for a Stephen Spielberg movie to discover what he is talking about either. The inhumane treatment of Palestinians by Israel is no more a secret than Israel’s nuclear weapons. These are merely public secrets that the Jewish controlled mass media will not talk about it. They have the chutzpah to disregard those facts in favor of their own homegrown facts and they know with confidence they will not be challenged on them. At least not challenged within the mass media they have under their thumb.

So back to our Jewish King from Brooklyn waiting on his guest to give him enough rope to really jerk him off his feet. With another calm look on his face Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says “Do you want me to speak about it? You really would like me to speak about it?” Yes, yes of course I do King replies.

And Ahmadinejad has his predictable responses to this line of questioning. Again, the type of questioning that Larry King knows can result in someone like the President of Iran really alienating most of the U.S. based audience tuning into the Larry King Live show. And Ahmadinejad is completely accustom to this tactic and can always handle it strategically and intelligently. He knows what to say and what not to say and he knows not to take the bait. So I will not go into great detail quoting him directly and hopefully you will find the interview yourself.

Essentially Ahmadinejad brings up two irrefutable facts when he has to respond to the Holocaust Denier label. His first response to Larry King is the one I always use if anyone asks me if I believe the Holocaust happened or not. To me this is the most compelling evidence that something must be wrong with what the world has been told about the Holocaust. That is the simple fact that you can not ask about it. And what historical fact is so sacred that it is forbidden, in some countries it is illegal and in most other countries it is very politically incorrect, to ask questions about it. That is what President Ahmadinejad has been saying. And that is how he responded to Larry King.

Ahmadinejad says “as a University professor, I've had in my own mind several questions that I spoke out loud about it. And I thought everybody has a right to ask questions. Isn't that the case? I mean, do you think that raising a question is a crime?” And on the second irrefutable fact Ahmadinejad points out that the Palestinians had nothing to do with any Holocaust period. This is something that supposedly happened in Europe not in the Middle East and the Palestinians should not be held accountable for it.

Larry King went on and on throwing his rhetorical knock-out punch question but it never came close to landing.  He kept saying it is a simple yes or no question. Just answer my simple yes or no question as Lawrence was starting to get irritated. Do you believe the Holocaust happened? Yes or no, yes or no! But instead Ahmadinejad kept asking why should the Palestinians be subjected to genocide? Why are they held accountable for something that happened in Europe, why he kept asking. And that was that. The interview ended.