Wow! Seriously? The Second Coming by 2050?
Hi! My first post in this forum. Been taking mental notes for a long time trying to keep track of all the things I see happening in this country that leave me a bit bewildered or dumbfounded. This is what I will call a ‘Wow! Seriously?’ series.
In the August edition of Smithsonian magazine, a new poll was released from the well known and respected Pew Research Center and Smithsonian Magazine. The poll was conducted via telephone and online interviews with over 1,500 Americans last April and was released in the “Smithsonian magazine’s 40th Anniversary” edition.
The results are worth review and you can find all the details at the below site and PDF file. The poll showed a noticeable dip in Americans optimism compared to a 1999 poll covering the same subjects, not really suprizing. But what caught my eye was the below.
Roughly 41% of Americans think that Jesus Christ will return to earth by the year 2050, this would be the Second Coming of Christ, you know, the Messiah, the Savior, the Lamb of God, the Son of God. This would be the biblical Rapture I believe. All tour dates were canceled at the Millennium which was the last time I heard about this Prophecy. This is my first Wow! Seriously? contribution to this blog.
Sure, you could play the statistics and say that more Americans think this absolutely will not happen but you would miss the Wow! Seriously? point. You should think on this one a bit and let it bake for awhile.
Pew/Smithsonian Poll: Americans Predict Life in 2050
“About four-in-ten (41%) expect Jesus Christ to return while slightly more (46%) say this will definitely or probably not happen. Opinions about the return of Jesus Christ are little changed from 1999 when 44% said it would definitely or probably happen.”
So for you statisticians and common-sensors out there, you know who you are, run the numbers and use a little simple mathematics. According to the current U.S. Bureau of the Census’ POPClock Projection , there are roughly 309 million people in this country, or 309,744,156 and counting. Of these, and keeping in mind the Pew reported +/- 3% margin of error, almost 127 million Americans expect “Jesus Christ’s Return to Earth” within the next forty years. So that means if you took the entire populations of California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, and Pennsylvania (the top 6 most populous states), throw in Phoenix, Arizona (the 5th most populous city), you would still need over 54,000 more people to represent the number falling into the category expecting “Jesus Christ’s Return to Earth” . So to underscore the point, Wow! Seriously?
Now please excuse me while I pick our girls up at soccer practice and explain a few things about peer-pressure, the psychological concept of conformity, and spend a moment of appreciation for our homeschooling curriculum.
Click here for original Poll: Americans Predict Life in 2050 article
Click here for original Poll: Americans Predict Life in 2050 (FULL PDF report) article
5 Responses to “Wow! Seriously? The Second Coming by 2050?”
Comment from Will Williams
Time July 16, 2010 at 2:06 pm
It’s nice to discover a blog that honors Dr. Pierce and strives to preserve his body of work, his vision.
What set the National Alliance, under William L. Pierce, apart from the rest of the so-called “movement” was our policy proscribing Xianity as an ideology opposed to that of our Alliance. Xians were allowed to join NA but soon learned the Alliance’s position on its members worshiping the Jew’s tribal god YHWH or their spreading the Jew Word as an Alliance member.
The following excerpt from the NA Membership Handbook was clumsily removed by those who hijacked the NA after Pierce’s death. The usurpers wanted to go “big tent” with an expedient Xian-friendly Alliance outreach, compromising the very policy that set Pierce’s strict biological movement above the Xian-friendly big tent compromisers.
How has that worked out? Dr. Pierce was carefully building a true vanguard around the core of men and women who agreed with him and his no nonsense, hard line. The Alliance message didn’t appeal to the gullible and superstitious herd by soft-soaping them. Pierce’s stated vision was to build a movement of will and determination from those of us who agreed with him, not those who disagreed and opposed us.
—begin from 2d. -OPPOSED IDEOLOGIES—
2d.vii. Christianity
The National Alliance is not a religious organization, in the ordinary sense of the term. It does, however, have to concern itself with religious matters, because religions influence the behavior of people, society, and governments. The doctrines of various religious groups — Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, et al. — deal with the temporal as well as spiritual matters and therefore often conflict with National Alliance doctrine.
Christian doctrines are of much greater concern to the National Alliance than the doctrines of other large religious groups, because Christianity is the most influential religion in the United States, Europe, and the rest of the White world. Most members of the National Alliance come from families which are, or a generation ago were, at least nominally Christian, and very few come from families which practice or practiced, Islam, Buddhism, or other religions. Furthermore, the history of our race for the last thousand years has been inextricably bound up with Christianity. The National Alliance really cannot avoid taking positions regarding Christian beliefs and practices, despite the complications this causes our work.
The immediate and inevitable fact which forces us to come to grips with Christianity is that the mainstream Christian churches are all, without exception, preaching a doctrine of White racial extinction. They preach racial egalitarianism and racial mixing. They preach non-resistance to the takeover of our society by non-Whites. It was the Christian churches, more than any other institution, which paralyzed the will of White South Africans to survive. It is the Christian establishment in the United States which is preeminent in sapping the will of White Americans to resist being submerged in the non-White tide sweeping across the land. Most Christian authorities collaborate openly with the Jews, despite the contempt and abuse they receive in return, and the rest at least follow Jewish policies on the all-important matter of race. The occasional anomaly—a Catholic bishop in Poland speaking out angrily against Jewish arrogance, a few Protestant groups in the United States expressing sympathy for oppressed Palestinians—does not invalidate the rule.
We are obliged, therefore, to oppose the Christians churches and to speak out against their doctrines. But we do not, as some groups have done, accuse the Christian leaders of being false Christians. We do not say, “We are the real Christians, because we stand for the values which the mainstream churches stood for a century ago, before they were subverted.” We do not reach for our Bibles and point to verses which seem to be in accord with the policies of the National Alliance and contrary to the present policies of the Christian churches. A diligent Bible scholar can find in the Judeo-Christian scriptures support for—or ammunition against—virtually any policy whatsoever.
Beyond the immediate conflict between us and the Christian churches on racial matters there is a long-standing and quite fundamental ideological problem with Christianity. It is not an Aryan religion; like Judaism and Islam it is Semitic in origin, and all its centuries of partial adaptation to Aryan ways have not changed its basic flavor. It was carried by a Jew, Saul of Tarsus (later known as Paul), from the Levant to the Greco-Roman world. Its doctrines that the meek shall inherit the earth and that the last shall be the first found fertile soil among the populous slave class in Rome. Centuries later, as Rome was succumbing to an internal rot in which Christianity played no small part, legions of Roman conscripts imposed the imported religion on the Celtic and Germanic tribes to the north.
Eventually Christianity became a unifying factor for Europe, and in the name of Jesus Europeans resisted the onslaught of Islamic Moors and Turks and expelled the “Christ-killing” Jews from one country after another. But the religion retained its alien mind-set, no matter how much some aspects of it were Europeanized. Its otherworldliness is fundamentally out of tune with the Aryan quest for knowledge and for progress; its universalism conflicts directly with Aryan striving for beauty and strength; its delineation of the roles of man and god offends the Aryan sense of honor and self-sufficiency.
Finally Christianity, like the other Semitic religions, is irredeemably primitive. Its deity is thoroughly anthropomorphic, and its “miracles”—raising the dead, walking on water, curing the lame and the blind with a word and a touch—are the crassest superstition.
We may have fond memories of the time before the Second World War when pretty, little girls in white dresses attended all-White Sunday schools, and Christianity seemed a bulwark of family values and a foe to degeneracy and indiscipline. We may cherish the tales of medieval valor, when Christian knights fought for god and king—if we can overlook the Christian church’s bloodthirsty intolerance, which stifled science and philosophy for centuries and sent tens of thousands of Europeans to the stake for heresy.
We may even find Christian ethics congenial, if we follow the standard Christian practice of interpreting many of its precepts—such as the one about turning the other cheek—in such a way that they do not interfere with our task. But we should remember that nothing essential in Christian ethics is specifically Christian. Any successful society must have rules of social conduct. Lying and stealing were shunned in every Aryan society long before Christianity appeared. Our pagan ancestors did not need Christian missionaries to tell them how to behave or to explain honor and decency to them—quite the contrary!
Historians may argue the pros and cons of Christianity’s role in our race’s past: whether or not the unity it provided during a period of European consolidation outweighed the loss of good genes it caused in the Crusades and the bloody religious wars of the Middle Ages (and through the Church’s policy of priestly celibacy); whether the splendid Gothic cathedrals which rose in Europe during the four centuries and the magnificent religious music of the 18th century were essentially Christian or essentially Aryan in inspiration; whether Christianity’s stand against the evils of self-indulgence—against gluttony and drunkenness and greed—was worth its shackling of the human mind in superstition or not. One thing already is clear, however: Christianity is not a religion that we can wish on future generations of our race.
We need ethics; we need values and standards; we need a world view. And if one wants to call all of these things together a religion, then we need a religion. One might choose instead, however, to call them a philosophy of life. Whatever we call it, it must come from our own race soul; it must be an expression of the innate Aryan nature. And it must be conducive to our mission of racial progress. Christianity, as the word is commonly understood, meets neither of these criteria.
The fact is that, completely aside from the racial question, no person who wholeheartedly believes Christian doctrine can share our values and goals, because Christian doctrine holds that this world is of little importance, being only a proving ground for the spiritual world which one enters after death. Christian doctrine also holds that the condition of this world is not man’s responsibility, because an omnipotent and omniscient deity alone has that responsibility.
Although some Christians do believe Christian doctrine wholeheartedly, however, most do not. Most instinctively feel what we explicitly believe, even if they have repressed those feelings in an effort to be “good” Christians. Because of this many nominal Christians, even those affiliated with mainstream churches, can, under the right circumstances, be persuaded to work for the interests of their race. Other nominal Christians—especially those who stand apart from any of the mainstream churches—have interpreted Christian doctrine in such an idiosyncratic way that the contradictions between their beliefs and ours have been minimized.
For these reasons we want to avoid conflict with Christians to the extent that we can. We don’t want to give unnecessary offense, even when we speak out against the doctrines of these churches. We don’t want to ridicule their beliefs, which in some cases are sincerely held. Some of these people later will reject Christianity’s racial doctrines. Some will reject Christianity altogether. We want to help them in their quest for truth when we can, and we want to keep the door open to them.
Members who want to study the subject of Christianity and its relationship to our task in depth should read Which Way Western Man? by our late member William Simpson. The book’s initial chapters describe the spiritual odyssey of a man of exceptional spiritual sensitivity, who was far more intensely a Christian than nearly any Christian living today and who eventually understood the racially destructive nature of Christianity and rejected it.
A more concise study of the difference between the Christian world view and ours is given in Wulf Sörensen’s The Voice of Our Ancestors, which was reprinted in National Vanguard No.107.
—end—
Comment from Cosmotheist
Time July 17, 2010 at 10:20 am
I find myself concurring with Pierces assessment, which finds,based upon substantial historical evidence, and the weight of numerous examples of accepted Xian dogma, that Xianity is incongruent to even the most basic principles of racial survival, racial preservation, and racial prosperity. Xianity prescribes ideological formulas for subjugation, submission, docileness, weakness, straight from the lips of JC. judge not lest ye be judged; let he who is without sin cast the first stone; when in Rome, do as the Romans; when someone strikee you, turn the other cheek, no more eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth; pray for your enemies; do not build your riches here on earth but in heaven. These are ideas which are necessary to believe in order for free men to voluntarily become slaves.
It seems like design that Xianity would come from the Jews, about the time that the Jews first encountered Europeans and found themselves in conflict with them. And of course, the Jews believe in the here and now, not the afterlife. Neither do the Jews accept any pacifist dogma. The Jews have sold White Gentiles a timeshare or insurance plan for the afterlife, and the cost is high… It will cost you blood, indenture, and the loss of your racial continuity and racial soul.
Not to worry though. Jesus will save you.
Comment from Will Williams
Time July 17, 2010 at 10:09 pm
Dr. Pierce was building the White resistance based around this assessment of Xianity as being “Jewish poison” and an altogether unsuitable creed for European Man. His simple strategy was to build an eventual mass movement around a core of kinsmen like us who agreed with him that “Xianity is not a religion that we can wish on future generations of our race.”
Sometimes he would simply state when asked his opinion on this subject, “Xianity is not grounded in reality.” Period. What more of an explanation should a serious race realist need than that?
I found another classic, spare reply like that from Dr. Pierce while reading his biography, _The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds_ (p.207): “I think that Solzhenitsyn is a lot more Christian than I am. In fact, I’m not a Christian at all; I don’t put any stock in that.”
That’s not to say WLP didn’t admire AS, because he did. He wanted to establish to his interviewer where he parted company with AS — a MAJOR difference in world views.
Comment from Will Williams
Time August 3, 2010 at 10:32 pm
I don’t see where comments can be added to the WLP tribute section, so I’ll put this lyrical tribute to him here and mods can move it’s more appropriately posted elsewhere. It’s attributed to “Professor of Racial Cleansing” and I found it here: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=31318
THE FAME OF A DEAD MAN’S DEEDS
Adaptation 5
CHORUS (Female): Liberals and Jews, he was to say,
destroyed America, along with the gays.
They’d filled our white schools with minority thugs,
then flashed happy smiles and gave us all hugs.
As the darkness grew nearer, our cities grew browner,
No one to help us, no one to care! The white race was dying,
tryin’ to hold on, against a cold wind, a lone child was cryin’!
Oh, cryin’!
Oh, cryin’!
In the wind! In the rain! Feel the pain!
White man, arise!
Your time has not ended!
You’ll find your way again,
For though cattle may die and men may die,
the fame of a dead man’s deeds never dies!
MALE VOCALIST: Everywhere he looked, nothing but decay,
Everywhere he walked, a passion to say,
Give back my America, the one white men made!
Honor our Forefathers, with the blood that they paid!
But who was this man, I often hear asked,
what did he do, what was his task?
Georgia born on a hot Southern morn, he saw a bright vision,
grown to strong manhood he began on his mission.
He searched far and wide for just the right men,
then gathered them together and called them his kin.
He asked of them everything, and then a bit more,
he had no other choice for we were at war.
CHORUS (Female): Liberals and Jews, he was to say,
destroyed America, along with the gays.
They’d filled our white schools with minority thugs,
then flashed happy smiles and gave us all hugs.
As the darkness grew nearer, our cities grew browner,
No one to help us, no one to care! The white race was dying,
tryin’ to hold on, against a cold wind, a lone child was cryin’!
Oh, cryin’!
Oh, cryin’!
In the wind! In the rain! Feel the pain!
White man, arise!
Your time has not ended!
You’ll find your way again,
For though cattle may die and men may die,
the fame of a dead man’s deeds never dies!
MALE VOCALIST: The years raced on by as America grew darker,
but he never gave in and worked even harder.
Millions in time came to hear his bold words,
of Third World invasion by teeming brown herds.
But a force rose against them called the National Alliance,
A new path of hope, full of strength and defiance.
More came to join his undying quest,
to work at his side and never let rest,
His dream of a nation both prosperous and free,
Would you not follow him, from sea to bright sea?
The answer is clear my wondering friend,
it sings in the mountains, it sighs on the wind,
CHORUS (Female): Liberals and Jews, he was to say,
destroyed America, along with the gays.
They’d filled our white schools with minority thugs,
then flashed happy smiles and gave us all hugs.
As the darkness grew nearer, our cities grew browner,
No one to help us, no one to care! The white race was dying,
tryin’ to hold on, against a cold wind, a lone child was cryin’!
Oh, cryin’!
Oh, cryin’!
In the wind! In the rain! Feel the pain!
White man, arise!
Your time has not ended!
You’ll find your way again,
For though cattle may die and men may die,
the fame of a dead man’s deeds never dies!
MALE VOCALIST: He witnessed Tomorrow in the palm of his hand,
And realized two futures destined our land,
One of dark peoples, and America’s fall,
or one of White Glory, and triumph for all,
He knew this well and decided to fight,
and gave us his spirit to help us unite.
But now he is gone, and the torch has been passed,
will you not follow in the light that he cast?
The answer is clear my wondering friend,
it sings in the mountains, it sighs on the wind,
The future is ours if only we but heed,
his undying courage, and the wisdom of his deeds.
CHORUS (Female): Liberals and Jews, he was to say,
destroyed America, along with the gays.
They’d filled our white schools with minority thugs,
then flashed happy smiles and gave us all hugs.
As the darkness grew nearer, our cities grew browner,
No one to help us, no one to care! The white race was dying,
tryin’ to hold on, against a cold wind, a lone child was cryin’!
Oh, cryin’!
Oh, cryin’!
In the wind! In the rain! Feel the pain!
White man, arise!
Your time has not ended!
You’ll find your way again,
For though cattle may die and men may die,
the fame of a dead man’s deeds never dies!
©2006







Comment from Sally Mills
Time July 15, 2010 at 10:50 pm
The biggest problem with those cultists who believe in the rapture is that they—Judeo Christians—refuse to take any personal responsibility for letting their race and nation go down the drain. Instead, they cast their burdens upon a dead jew on a stick, believing they need not fight nor even resist, because a mythical deity will be taking care of that for them. Cowards.
The rapture dogma is just a coward’s rationalization for inaction. Funny how these same cowards take an ideological 180 degree turn when they perceive that jewish or Israeli interests are at stake: suddenly, then, they are willing to die or make sacrifices. Just not for their own race and nation. Just for the jews.
I keep my children out of church. I don’t want them molested by priests or taught to be cowards. My children are taught to defend our own race and nation, and we bear this burden. That is our cross to carry. My husband is a fighter and I would not have befouled my genepool with the blood of a Christian coward.